The podcast provides an extensive analysis of the systemic and global threat posed to judicial independence by intense political polarization. It explains that this polarization transforms the judiciary from a neutral arbiter into a primary battleground of partisan conflict, where institutions are viewed as political assets rather than guardians of the rule of law. The text illustrates this challenge through case studies detailing how governments in Poland and Hungary systematically captured their judiciaries via legislative and procedural changes, contrasting these methods with the long-term ideological stacking of the US federal courts. Furthermore, the source examines how traditional safeguards, such as life tenure and budgetary control, have become vulnerabilities that accelerate politicisation, and concludes by discussing the necessity of a multi-front counter-offensive involving judicial review, civil society mobilisation, and international solidarity to preserve the rule of law.
Trending
- Special Issue: Rituals, Rights, and Recognition: Reassessing Hindu Marriage Validity in India after Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal
- Reforming India’s Judiciary: Addressing the Case Backlog Crisis
- A Definitive Resource Article: Digital Tools for Constitutional Research: AI and Legal Technology in Constitutional Studies
- The Algorithmic Witness: AI, Copyright, and Creativity in the Dock
- The Algorithmic Witness: Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Fight for Truth
- Podcast 01: The Gavel and the Fray: Judicial Independence in an Era of Polarization
- The Writ of Prohibition in Bangladesh: A Definitive Guide to Preventing Judicial and Administrative Overreach
- The Architecture of Authority: A Comparative Analysis of the Supremacy Clause, Federal Preemption, and the Resolution of Inter-Governmental Conflict