Skip to content
Monday
The Mandamus

Legal Analysis, Opinion & Public Reason

Submit

The Mandamus

Author Guidelines

Practical requirements for pitches, manuscripts, sources, disclosures and editorial review.

We welcome original work from practitioners, scholars, judges where ethically appropriate, researchers, journalists, students and specialists whose expertise materially advances a legal question.

Begin with an argument

A strong pitch states a proposition that can be tested. It does not merely announce a broad topic. Explain what the prevailing account misses, why the issue matters now and which authorities will carry the analysis.

Usual lengths

Dispatch

600–1,000 words

Commentary

900–1,800 words

Opinion

800–1,600 words

Analysis

1,500–3,000 words

Case or Statute Note

1,500–3,000 words

Longform or Symposium

By agreement with the editor

Manuscript structure

  • Use a precise headline and a subtitle that states the significance.
  • Place the central argument early.
  • Use descriptive headings for long pieces.
  • Link or cite the best available primary authority.
  • Explain technical terms when a careful non-specialist reader may not know them.
  • Separate fact, authority, inference and normative judgment.

Originality and simultaneous submission

Tell the editor whether the work has appeared elsewhere, is under review elsewhere or develops earlier work. Republishing or substantially recycling undisclosed text is not acceptable.

Disclosure

Disclose professional involvement, representation, funding, institutional roles, litigation participation, political office, financial interests or close personal relationships that a reasonable reader would consider relevant.

What editing may involve

Accepted work may receive structural editing, source verification, citation editing, legal-risk review, headline development and copy editing. Authors approve material changes, but the journal controls style, presentation and publication timing.

What a complete pitch contains

  • A working headline and proposed format.
  • The central proposition in one or two sentences.
  • Why the issue matters now and to whom.
  • The principal judgment, statute, data or authority.
  • The argument’s likely structure and meaningful counterargument.
  • Estimated length and proposed delivery date.
  • Relevant biography, expertise and prior work.
  • Conflicts, representation, funding, simultaneous submission and previous publication.

Style and reader orientation

Write for an intelligent reader who may not practise in the field. Prefer precise verbs and concrete propositions. Define specialised terms at first use. Use headings to reveal the logic of the argument. Avoid inflated claims, performative certainty, unexplained abbreviations and long quotations that substitute for analysis. Use respectful language when criticising courts, institutions, counsel, parties and other authors.

Sources and working files

Authors should retain copies of central authorities, datasets, calculations, permissions, interview notes and translated material until the editorial process and any reasonable post-publication period are complete. Editors may request the complete source rather than a screenshot or extract. Where a source is inaccessible to readers, explain its provenance and why it is reliable.

Authorship and acknowledgements

A byline is reserved for people who made a substantial intellectual contribution, approved the final work and accept responsibility for it. Research, editing, translation, data or institutional assistance that does not meet that threshold should be acknowledged with consent. Ghost authorship, purchased authorship and omission of a material author are prohibited.

Permissions and third-party rights

Authors must identify photographs, charts, extended quotations, tables and other third-party material. Do not assume that online availability permits reuse. The author should obtain necessary permissions or provide enough information for the editor to assess a lawful exception. Confidentiality, privilege, court restrictions and contractual obligations remain the author’s responsibility to disclose.

Editorial decision outcomes

DeclineThe proposal is outside scope, insufficiently original, unsupported, conflicted or unsuitable in its present form.
Revise the pitchThe question is promising but the proposition, scope, authority or timing needs clarification.
Invite manuscriptThe editor requests a draft without guaranteeing publication.
Revise and resubmitA draft requires substantial work before a final decision.
Conditional acceptancePublication depends on completion of stated substantive, source, disclosure or legal-risk requirements.
AcceptanceThe article enters final production, subject to copy, metadata and presentation checks.

After acceptance

The journal may edit headline, structure, length, citations and style. Authors receive material substantive changes for approval. Publication timing may change because of verification, legal developments, operational constraints or editorial priorities. Authors must promptly disclose new interests or authority that affect the article before publication.

Author questions

May I submit a piece based on my thesis or conference paper?

Yes, if it is adapted for the journal, substantially original in expression, appropriately attributed and not restricted by another publisher or institution.

Can I submit in Bangla?

Where the editorial team can support the required review and editing, yes. The language of publication, translation responsibility and authoritative version should be agreed before acceptance.

Will I be paid?

Any honorarium or commissioned fee must be agreed in writing before work begins. Absence of payment does not reduce the journal’s standards or give the author a right to publication.

Can I withdraw a submission?

Yes before publication, but notify the editor promptly. Withdrawal after substantial commissioned work or after final scheduling may affect future commissioning, especially where costs or exclusivity were agreed.